SEO, vente, David Aziz

Tags: David Azizseovente

You may also like...

• 

  La pause, beunaise et gourmande: pain pita

• 

  Avis sur classementdesecoles.com, classement,ranking score, school, ecole, enseignement, avis, siteweb, website

• 

  The KR Jaan is scam, muhammad rizwan scam, nutritionca.com is scam, completefoods.co is scam, ketobodz keto is scam, sexdoru.com: piracy! kixover.com is scam! athleticsgearstoreonline.com is scam! shoprangersapparel.com is scam!, Redsoxgearstore.com is scam! Cardio vs Weights (Best Way to Burn Fat) 2 070 431 vues Gravity Transformation – Fat Loss Experts 2,46 M abonnés Ajoutée le 6 juin 2018 Cardio or Weight Training? Which way is the best way to burn fat? Which is best for fat loss and overall weight loss? I answer all of these questions and more in today’s video. Use your time efficiently by learning which one of these is best for fat loss. Once you know how to burn fat and gain muscle at the gym progress accelerates. 🔥 FREE 6 Week Body Transformation Challenge: http://bit.ly/lose-fat62 📲 Fat Loss Calculator: http://bit.ly/2OPJfFq 👦🏻 If you want to train with me directly to transform your body as fast as possible, fill out a training application and see if you qualify here(𝐔𝐒𝐀, 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐚, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐔𝐊 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘): http://bit.ly/2ZmdVXM Timestamps: Traditional Cardio (Steady State, Long Duration) 1:00 Fat Burning Zone 2:11 Weight Training & Burning Calories 3:46 Higher Heart Rate 5:47 Cardio After Weights 6:06 Peripheral Heart Action Training 6:51 High Intensity Training Routine 8:39 If you’re trying to burn fat why not do it in a way that has you working smarter rather than harder. Most people automatically assume that cardio is better for fat loss and weights are better for building muscle. And this may be true if you compare traditional steady-state cardio to traditional weight training but there are different forms of weight training that incorporate very effective new training techniques that may be far more beneficial for fat loss. So If youre the type of person that wouldnt mind burning fat faster with less effort then stick with me through this video because I’m going to give you a couple surprising new ways that you could lose fat way faster with both cardio and weight training models and ill make sure that you fully understand which one is best for you and your goals. Now if you’re looking for the quick overnight fix I don’t have that for you but this is as close as you’re going to get to that magic bullet quick fix to spending less time in the gym while burning more fat from your workouts. So let’s start first by taking a closer look at Cardio and weight training at their core. Traditional cardio is usually performed on a treadmill an elliptical stair climber a bike or even on a rowing machine. When I talk about traditional cardio I’m mostly referring to steady-state long duration cardio where you’re continuously repeating the same low to moderate intensity motions like jogging, biking, or swimming for an extended period of time. Most of traditional types of cardio are forms of aerobic training. Aerobic training primarily involves using oxygen to sufficiently meet the body’s energy demands during exercise. On the other hand traditional weight training where you lift a heavy weight load for a certain amount of reps before taking a break and then repeating for more sets, THAT is considered anaerobic training. With anaerobic training oxygen alone cannot supply enough energy to meet the demands placed on the body so glycogen from the muscles is primarily used to fuel the activity. Generally speaking, you’ll burn more calories for each session of cardio than weight training for about the same amount of effort. Minute per minute, cardio burns more calories. But does that mean that cardio is better for fat loss? Let’s take a closer look. For a long time it was believed that to burn the maximum amount of fat you had to stay in what was known as the fat burning zone which mostly could only be maintained through aerobic cardiovascular activity. The idea behind the fat burning zone was that you would burn a higher percentage of fat calories rather than carb calories when you stayed at about 70 percent of your maximum heart rate. And this made sense to most people because once an activity became too intense the pathway for energy would change to anaerobic and begin primarily burning glycogen or carbs for fuel rather than using fat oxidation. However, it’s been proven that the fat burning zone is a myth because both types of training aerobic and anaerobic can burn plenty of fat. And if you burn more overall calories from a higher intensity workout like the ones I’m about to share with you, so anything above roughly 70% of your maximum heart rate you might be burning a higher percentage of carbs, but you’re also burning more overall calories because you’re heart rate is higher and the activity is more intense. So even if you have a smaller percentage of fat coming from a larger overall number of calories, you can still wind up burning more fat. This is easy to understand if I give you an example like take 50 percent of a smaller number like 500, and then take 30 percent of a larger number like 1,000. Just because you’re burning a higher percentage of fat from lower intensity exercise like steady state cardio, doesn’t mean that you’re burning more fat. On top of that even though we know cardio will typically burn more calories per session than weight training, research has shown that